• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter
Photo

The Sigma 100-400mm C ...


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#21 stoppingdown

stoppingdown

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 547 posts
  • LocationGenoa / Milan, Italy

Posted 19 July 2017 - 01:20 PM

I misunderstood, my fault. Anyway, yours is a good piece of information: for $30 my primary worry is that the thing falls apart just a couple of days after the warranty expires, but since you got it two years ago, it passed the test.  :)


  • Richardma likes this

stoppingdown.net

 

Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm ƒ/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm ƒ/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm ƒ/2.8, Samyang 8mm ƒ/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm ƒ/2 
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.

#22 JoJu

JoJu

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,733 posts
  • LocationSwitzerland

Posted 19 July 2017 - 02:09 PM

Nope. This thing is massive, very precise and has even stopper screws. It's copied, but from experts. Anodization is flawless, the only issue with all those copied Arca rail is, they are better in the clamps with screw.

 

So, this type will work just fine:

SRB40_detail_1_326x326.png

 

But here the problems begin

 

QRB50_detail_1_326x326.png

Same goes for genuine Arca clamps - the mixture of the plates sometimes doesn't work because the copies are not quaility controlled with a gauge.



#23 backcountryskier

backcountryskier

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 86 posts
  • LocationCalgary, Canada

Posted 20 September 2017 - 03:46 AM

?



#24 JoJu

JoJu

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,733 posts
  • LocationSwitzerland

Posted 20 September 2017 - 06:31 AM

A question mark is not a question.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



© by photozone.de