+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: Name a lens for which you would invest in a system (/showthread.php?tid=148)
Name a lens for which you would invest in a system - thxbb12 - 10-02-2017
Quote:yeah, with the small addendum "excellent lenses for those who have no problems with focus by wire" <_<
Why do you need to use MF on AF lenses?
It's mostly justified for macro work, but otherwise I just don't see the necessity.
Name a lens for which you would invest in a system - JJ_SO - 10-02-2017
Good question. Had to think a bit about the answer, but I found a couple:
- using manual focus can be helpful when using a tele-zoom like the 100-400 and the focus gets continuously distracted by twigs, parts of fences or other obstacles
- astrophotography (but that's difficult with EVF anyway)
- studioscenes, where it's enough to focus manually
- all kinds of videography (there's a nice video from theCameraStore in which they explain why manual focus by wire really sucks and AF is just hunting)
Name a lens for which you would invest in a system - Studor13 - 10-02-2017
Quote:Why do you need to use MF on AF lenses?
It's mostly justified for macro work, but otherwise I just don't see the necessity.
For landscape photography, especially at night it’s a lot easier to set focus at infinity and you are done.
How do you use AF when there isn’t enough light for the AF system to work?
Name a lens for which you would invest in a system - obican - 10-02-2017
I like focus by wire. Actually, I even prefer focus by wire on mirrorless cameras to mechanical focus rings, especially those of AF lenses with 30 degree turns.
Name a lens for which you would invest in a system - Rover - 10-03-2017
Quote:For landscape photography, especially at night it’s a lot easier to set focus at infinity and you are done.When that happens, I mostly surmise that if it's so dark that the top of the line AF isn't working, there is no point in shooting anyway.
How do you use AF when there isn’t enough light for the AF system to work?
Name a lens for which you would invest in a system - JJ_SO - 10-03-2017
So, no startrails? No further picture of milky way?
Name a lens for which you would invest in a system - Brightcolours - 10-03-2017
No night landscapes?
Name a lens for which you would invest in a system - Rover - 10-03-2017
I said "mostly".
I'm doing this but only once in a blue moon (thrice last year and probably never anywhen else 
).Name a lens for which you would invest in a system - Studor13 - 10-03-2017
Quote:When that happens, I mostly surmise that if it's so dark that the top of the line AF isn't working, there is no point in shooting anyway.
Sometimes there is no need to rely on the AF system. You can set focus to just about anywhere on a lens wider than 20mm and everything will be adequately be in focus. I prefer infinity and there are good reasons but that's another story.
Packing your gear just because the light is too low seems like a limp excuse.
There are great shots possible everywhere at anytime of day and night!
Name a lens for which you would invest in a system - thxbb12 - 10-03-2017
All right, all right. MF is indeed useful when shooting night landscapes.
However, I still fail understanding why focus by wire is an impediment in such situations...