welcome some ... - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: welcome some ... (/showthread.php?tid=1946) |
welcome some ... - Klaus - 04-08-2013 ... bloody awesomeness ... welcome some ... - Brightcolours - 04-08-2013 Some... Zeiss 135mm f2? welcome some ... - Guest - 04-08-2013 This is some wicked stuff. Curious to see what lens it is. Christian welcome some ... - Guest - 04-08-2013 Quote:... bloody awesomeness ... Well, the Canon 24mm IS remains also to be tested, though the 28mm IS version didn't do as well as this. The 35mm IS is also possible, and I think that could achieve this result (the old one wasn't too bad either). welcome some ... - Guest - 04-08-2013 Quote:Well, the Canon 24mm IS remains also to be tested, though the 28mm IS version didn't do as well as this. In hindsight, diffraction sets in quite early. So, depending on crop or FF, this could already set in around f5.6 or f8, so it can't be a very fast lens. Probably starting at f2.8 or maybe f4.0 24mm f2.8 IS? Seems unlikely you test something like a f2.8 - f4.0 tele (>300mm) ? welcome some ... - Brightcolours - 04-08-2013 The Canon EF 300mm f2.8 L IS USM II is the top lens, so a possibility. I doubt it is wide angle-ish, that is why I thought of the 135mm zeiss. welcome some ... - Guest - 04-08-2013 75f1.8 olympus very sharp lens welcome some ... - arvydas - 04-08-2013 New Canon's 35mm f/2 IS USM on APS-C? welcome some ... - PuxaVida - 04-08-2013 Truely awesome (assuming that it's a FF system results)... Some more clues before we place the bets? Serkan welcome some ... - vodanh1982 - 04-08-2013 Guest it is on a low MP camera. That graph is killing. Leica? |