VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 (/showthread.php?tid=5445) Pages:
1
2
|
VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 - Klaus - 02-04-2023 Nice ;-) https://www.opticallimits.com/sonyalphaff/1158-nikkor105f25 RE: VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 - Rover - 02-04-2023 2:1 so far in favour of the oldies. :-) How many will be there in total, 5? Edit: oh, 1 see, 4 100/105mm and two 135mm. Nice. RE: VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 - Klaus - 02-04-2023 The next one will be less enthusiastic ;-) RE: VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 - Rover - 02-05-2023 I still feel the old-timers might win by penalty shots. :-) Of course, if you had been testing wideangles, the result would not have been assured. RE: VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 - davidmanze - 02-05-2023 I enjoyed that review more than I would have done of any modern lens ..... takes me back to my Nikon F with the 50mm F1.4 ........ never had enough cash to step into the Nikkor primes ... I certainly wasn't expecting that level of sharpness from a 5 element lens either including great rendering ....... and it beat the pants off the Pentax which surprised me I'm loving this historic review series ....... a breath of old yet fresh air !! Good job Klaus RE: VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 - Rover - 02-05-2023 Looks like the 100s will be tied, depending on the magnitude of the disaster with the next one (Minolta Rokkor, right?) Klaus has already hinted it won't be pretty. :-) Btw today I got out to shoot with the most unlikely camera/lens combo ever. :-) the lens cost $70 and the camera was two orders of magnitude more expensive. RE: VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 - Klaus - 02-05-2023 Well, besides the budget constraints, I also chose the semi-fast 100s because these are usually fail-safe choices. The story will change very much when we move to the fast 50s and 28s ... RE: VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 - thxbb12 - 02-05-2023 I'm enjoying this series of old vintage lenses as well. Great idea and thanks for the tests, Klaus :-) The IQ of this Nikkor, especially the sharpness at 42MP, is truly impressive! When you see what this lens can manage in term of IQ with only 5 elements in 4 groups. It makes one wonder why modern lenses couldn't be made with fewer elements, be smaller, lighter and cheaper, especially given the computer aid in lens designs! What am I missing here? I'd love to see smaller, less complexe designes while still offering descent IQ. Would that not be possible? RE: VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 - Klaus - 02-05-2023 You can find many "simple" Leica M lenses with stellar performance. e.g. the M 90mm f/2.4 has just 5/4. The M75mm f/2.4 has 6/4. Even a behemoth such as the M 75mm f/1.25 has just 9/6. Some argue that fewer elements result in higher micro-contrast/3D. Possibly not wrong because every surface transition is a bit imperfect. Although you can counter-argue that this doesn't matter as long as the circle of confusion isn't bigger than a pixel. However, yes, there seems to be an inflation of lens elements lately. I'd also consider this an unhealthy development. RE: VINTAGE lens test: Nikkor P.C. 105mm f/2.5 - Klaus - 02-06-2023 FWIW - Nikon's own webpage about the history of this lens: https://imaging.nikon.com/history/story/0005/index.htm The "Afghan Girl" is one of the most iconic photos taken with this lens (the Ai-S version): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan_Girl |