+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: Not so bad ... (/showthread.php?tid=770)
Pages:
1
2
Not so bad ... - Klaus - 06-05-2016
Isn't it ?
(the first 3 center ratings are cropped at our "usual" maximum there)
Not so bad ... - youpii - 06-05-2016
mFT lens ?
Not so bad ... - Klaus - 06-06-2016
Quote:mFT lens ?Nope
Not so bad ... - Rover - 06-06-2016
All right, Watson... Since the last bars are so piss poor, it looks like they're from reading at f/22 at least. 6 stops wider is f/2.8 so it's a lens with the maximum aperture of f/2.8 (or very close). Since you rarely test lenses at f/22 unless they are Macro lenses, this must be some kind of f/2.8 Macro lens. There is no Near Center column though so this leaves me a little confused - but that probably means you're not testing on a7R II or 5DSR.
I would venture a guess that this is the new Tamron 90mm macro or Sigma 180mm macro on APS-C, but I can't be sure. A lousy Sherlock I am.
Not so bad ... - davidmanze - 06-06-2016
A lousy Sherlock I am.
Maybe not so lousy as that! It's a bit of a "what's in the box question".
Not so bad ... - Rover - 06-06-2016
I would have said "Sony 90mm f/2.8 G Macro" with a lot of certainty... if that one hadn't been already tested.
Then again, I may be utterly and completely wrong, and it's really just one focal length of a Nikon zoom lens...
Not so bad ... - JJ_SO - 06-06-2016
How about the Laowa 15 mm Macro? It certainly has "promising corners"
Not so bad ... - Klaus - 06-06-2016
Rover is on the right track there ;-)
Not so bad ... - Rover - 06-07-2016
Haha.
Well, if you have the graphical presentation (at least somewhat) ready, then the wait can't be long.
Not so bad ... - JJ_SO - 06-07-2016
Actually, the weather in Sydney appears to be quite rough, waves and storms and everything.
Could have been a test chart blown away after testing...
