Posts: 4,031
Threads: 41
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
22
To be fair, the Canon is pretty old in design and didn't compare too bad, given it's affordable price. I found the Apo-Sonnar the more expensive "disappointment", if whining around at this level would be a thing to do.
Posts: 558
Threads: 4
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
6
I'll take the Canon, thanks.
Much cheaper, MUCH smaller and lighter, much better resale value if needed.
Posts: 558
Threads: 4
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
6
When I look at the Sigma, I don't really see a larger aperture. I see it being much heavier and much less practical. Also, Canon can be had on the used market for much cheaper than that.