08-13-2010, 06:29 PM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1281711649' post='1746']
So, no surprises. AF-S 85/1.4 without VR, 24-120/4 VR (about time), 28-300 VR (and not 18-200 FX VR, does not seem to be meant as a professional tool, like 28-300L) and DX 55-300 VR (uhm, why?).
[/quote]
The 55-300 DX VR seems to be an answer to the Canon 55-250 IS, which has become very popular. I guess they will phase out the 55-200 DX VR?
The 28-300 VR obviously is going for the Tamron 28-300 VC.
So, no surprises. AF-S 85/1.4 without VR, 24-120/4 VR (about time), 28-300 VR (and not 18-200 FX VR, does not seem to be meant as a professional tool, like 28-300L) and DX 55-300 VR (uhm, why?).
[/quote]
The 55-300 DX VR seems to be an answer to the Canon 55-250 IS, which has become very popular. I guess they will phase out the 55-200 DX VR?
The 28-300 VR obviously is going for the Tamron 28-300 VC.