06-08-2010, 01:10 AM
Heya everyone,
A friend of mine took the first one with his £150 [size="1"](@ISO400)[/size] while I shot with my gear [size="1"](@ISO1600)[/size] that is roughly 10x more expensive.
Just out of curiosity, do you think there is a real justification of a price premium of 1000% over a compact regarding these two quick comparison pictures? Besides this, there is also a quite significant weight and size difference. I'd like to know which camera class would have the best so-called "Price / Image Quality ratio"; is it the entry DSLR class or the newer EVIL (electronic viewfinder interchangeable lens camera) cameras like the Sony NX-5/NX-3?
I'd like to see your image differences if you wouldn't mind posting them here <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
Regards and good night
Harald
A friend of mine took the first one with his £150 [size="1"](@ISO400)[/size] while I shot with my gear [size="1"](@ISO1600)[/size] that is roughly 10x more expensive.
Just out of curiosity, do you think there is a real justification of a price premium of 1000% over a compact regarding these two quick comparison pictures? Besides this, there is also a quite significant weight and size difference. I'd like to know which camera class would have the best so-called "Price / Image Quality ratio"; is it the entry DSLR class or the newer EVIL (electronic viewfinder interchangeable lens camera) cameras like the Sony NX-5/NX-3?
I'd like to see your image differences if you wouldn't mind posting them here <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
Regards and good night
Harald