10-31-2016, 11:21 AM
I'd just ask, is there a real physical difference in the lens, resulting in a subjective difference in the output? I watched one of "The Angry Photographer" videos previously, and what a waste of time. Pure unsubstantiated opinion. Zero information. I wouldn't mind if at any point he say why. I was going to do a comparison of assorted 50mm lenses from through the ages but never got around to it... sun is actually out today, kinda, so I might have a go this afternoon.
My only suspicion in this area is that the better technical images possible now lack a character from the flaws in older lenses.
My only suspicion in this area is that the better technical images possible now lack a character from the flaws in older lenses.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.