Poll: Which one?
This poll is closed.
Tamron 17-70
37.50%
3 37.50%
Sigma 18-50
62.50%
5 62.50%
Total 8 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tamron 17-70 mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD or Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN?
#7
When you follow the 2/3 top lens reviewers on the web (OL at the first place) you seldom have surprises when you buy a lens. The Sigma lens is confirming the many good features and the few pitfalls. Very sharp for landscape; good flare management with the sun in the frame through the whole focal range (much better than the Sony SEL1670Z that was a sort of Russian roulette, often producing purple/green streaks that seemed to be due to sand scratching the glass); very poor performance in close up at tele focal length and full open because a drop of contrast, but above all a monster LoCA; good performance and bokeh when stopped down to ƒ/5.6 - 8 (the Sony lens has about one stop of advantage here); good performance in close up at wide focal length even full open. So, yes, in some circumstances it enables you to take a decent flower/critter photo when you don't have a true macro length at hand.
stoppingdown.net

 

Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
  


Messages In This Thread
RE: Tamron 17-70 mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD or Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN? - by stoppingdown - 07-27-2023, 10:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)