10-18-2017, 11:31 AM
f/2.5
I know, stupid - f/4 or f/5.6 would have been better in terms of less images and max resolution. But it was late in the evening, the light already dim, no tripod at hand and I didn't want to lift ISO massively. It was no prepared idea, just a spontaneous "let's see how this toy works"-concept.
Wide open for an 14 mm, wider is only f/1.8
I know, stupid - f/4 or f/5.6 would have been better in terms of less images and max resolution. But it was late in the evening, the light already dim, no tripod at hand and I didn't want to lift ISO massively. It was no prepared idea, just a spontaneous "let's see how this toy works"-concept.
Wide open for an 14 mm, wider is only f/1.8