02-02-2013, 02:50 PM
Well, yes and no. The Tamron is not a constant f/4 lens, has lesser build quality, slightly worse bokeh, can not take a tripod mount or TCs and has less effective stabilization. And last but not least, the Nikon's AF is faster.
Of course it depends on individual priorities if that's worth the premium price.
-- Markus
Of course it depends on individual priorities if that's worth the premium price.
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com