The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable - Line: 895 - File: showthread.php PHP 7.2.24-0ubuntu0.18.04.8 (Linux)
File Line Function
/showthread.php 895 errorHandler->error



Opticallimits > Forums > Just Talk > SLT vs. SLR
Opticallimits > Forums > Just Talk > SLT vs. SLR

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
SLT vs. SLR
nandadevieast Offline
Member
***
Posts: 214
Threads: 24
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 0
#1
07-21-2012, 07:47 PM
Hi,

Its said that the SLT's are 1/3 to 1/2 stop behind the normal SLR's, because less light reaches the sensor.

What exactly the "less light reaches the sensor" means, and what are the implications?

Does this mean that if i shot at 1/250, F8 and ISO 1600 on both the cameras, the SLT image will be 1/3 stops underexposed compared to the normal SLR?

Are the implications limited to high ISO noise only?

best regards,

anurag
Website Find
Reply
  


Messages In This Thread
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-21-2012, 07:47 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Klaus - 07-21-2012, 08:35 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-21-2012, 08:54 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 05:59 AM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-22-2012, 08:32 AM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 12:03 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-22-2012, 01:07 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 04:25 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-22-2012, 04:58 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-22-2012, 06:21 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-24-2012, 01:05 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-24-2012, 01:10 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by Brightcolours - 07-24-2012, 05:01 PM
SLT vs. SLR - by nandadevieast - 07-25-2012, 08:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)