05-25-2012, 12:13 PM
This sentence in the FAQs is outdated by now - sorry for that. The text is several years old by now.
ACR is only used in a sub-set of our tests. Even so "ACR" doesn't tell you much because there are substantial differences between the ACR versions. Using defaults settings it was, I think, ACR 3 that produced the highest LW/PHs.
We are selecting both RAW converters and conversion various parameters on a per-camera basis by now. So for the Alpha-Tests we are not using ACR for instance.
The exact procedure will not be disclosed - this will just lead to endless discussions about setups and sample variation.
Frankly - I've got a life.![[Image: biggrin.gif]](http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
ACR is only used in a sub-set of our tests. Even so "ACR" doesn't tell you much because there are substantial differences between the ACR versions. Using defaults settings it was, I think, ACR 3 that produced the highest LW/PHs.
We are selecting both RAW converters and conversion various parameters on a per-camera basis by now. So for the Alpha-Tests we are not using ACR for instance.
The exact procedure will not be disclosed - this will just lead to endless discussions about setups and sample variation.
Frankly - I've got a life.