08-18-2010, 12:19 PM
[quote name='wim' timestamp='1282133048' post='1865']
Well, what about doing 24"x 36" prints after correction - the corners will be a lot less good due to the correction for barrel distortion <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />. Much less of a problem with the Canon <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.
Kind regards, Wim <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
Yes, but the Canon is less sharp to start with. Technically there's no reason in favor of the Canon I think.
Well, it's smaller if that counts maybe.
Well, what about doing 24"x 36" prints after correction - the corners will be a lot less good due to the correction for barrel distortion <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />. Much less of a problem with the Canon <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.
Kind regards, Wim <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
Yes, but the Canon is less sharp to start with. Technically there's no reason in favor of the Canon I think.
Well, it's smaller if that counts maybe.