07-21-2010, 06:14 AM
[quote name='Alexander ' date='20 July 2010 - 03:03 PM' timestamp='1279634637' post='1166']
Much more expensive, and not for Pentax. Also, it has much more chromatic aberration, but of course, that can be fixed in raw conversion.[/quote]
Price is a bit of a personal issue. Speaking only for myself I can only say that despite being far from wealthy I'd gladly pay more for a much more versatile lens (AF, wider, longer). Naturally, this is as the FF issue is not relevant to me.
Pentax? Well, I didn't know you are in Pentax. As a Pentax user your options are indeed more limited and this lens starts to make more sense.
[quote name='Alexander ' date='20 July 2010 - 03:03 PM' timestamp='1279634637' post='1166']
You should use the reply button right below the post, not at the bottom to get it as a reply to the post you're replying to.[/quote]
I sometimes do that and sometimes the other. As both options are available, why shouldn't I use the one I please?
Much more expensive, and not for Pentax. Also, it has much more chromatic aberration, but of course, that can be fixed in raw conversion.[/quote]
Price is a bit of a personal issue. Speaking only for myself I can only say that despite being far from wealthy I'd gladly pay more for a much more versatile lens (AF, wider, longer). Naturally, this is as the FF issue is not relevant to me.
Pentax? Well, I didn't know you are in Pentax. As a Pentax user your options are indeed more limited and this lens starts to make more sense.
[quote name='Alexander ' date='20 July 2010 - 03:03 PM' timestamp='1279634637' post='1166']
You should use the reply button right below the post, not at the bottom to get it as a reply to the post you're replying to.[/quote]
I sometimes do that and sometimes the other. As both options are available, why shouldn't I use the one I please?