01-25-2012, 06:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-25-2012, 06:47 PM by popo.)
Unless... you got the scoop on an EOS mirrorless? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
I wasn't aware, there is much important gear left
to be tested on EOS. ;-} ... Rainer
[quote name='Rainer' timestamp='1327530993' post='15226']
I wasn't aware, there is much important gear left
to be tested on EOS. ;-} ... Rainer
[/quote]
There's a few popular lenses missing from the tests, that much is certain.
I wonder what the second lens is going to be?
[quote name='Rover' timestamp='1327930944' post='15305']
There's a few popular lenses missing from the tests, that much is certain.
[/quote]
Yes, the 70-200/4L (on FF) is a deep dark gap for instance. The 20/2.8, 28/1.8 and 100/2 will also be reviewed soon.
I guess there's little point in testing big superteles, we all know they're going to be fantastic - well, for the price that's not unexpected, innit? Though I can likely predict the results of 20, 28 and 100: the 100 "solid", the 20 and 28 "iffy" to "disastrous".
Of course there are the old cheap 24/2.8 and 28/2.8 - and Markus tested the equivalents on his side of the fence - but they're too old and not likely to be used on FF anyways. Ditto 135 SF. Not sure about the CM.
Oh, and one more overlooked lens is the 28-135 IS. It's still in production so does it have a chance?
[quote name='Rover' timestamp='1328175279' post='15398']
Of course there are the old cheap 24/2.8 and 28/2.8 - and Markus tested the equivalents on his side of the fence - but they're too old and not likely to be used on FF anyways. Ditto 135 SF. Not sure about the CM.
[/quote]
Why would they not be used on FF? I'd be quite interested to see the 24mm f/2.8, 28mm f/1.8 and 28mm f/2.8 tested on photozone. They are still being sold and potentially quite good value for money compared with the alternatives - if the tests confirm it, of course. One of the benefits of full frame IMHO is having access to these wide angle primes that just don't exist in APS-C land.