Is that full frame and at infinity? I'm not an expert here but it seems pretty clean (maybe slight drop off in the corner esp the lower left) but not the ughly smearing that some of the wides produces.
Yes, this is how it "should be" when using a high-performance full format lens on an APS-C body.
It was full frame but not infinity hence (I presume) the slight out of focus for the building at the infinity on the lower left second picture .. grr I just now realized that the adapter pass infinity...
(any idea on how to fix that ?( does it need to be thiner or bigger?))
[quote name='lfred' timestamp='1332773688' post='17065']
It was full frame but not infinity hence (I presume) the slight out of focus for the building at the infinity on the lower left second picture .. grr I just now realized that the adapter pass infinity...
(any idea on how to fix that ?( does it need to be thiner or bigger?))
[/quote]
Well, you should actually be able to focus slightly beyond infinity in order to give some allowance e.g. for thermal expansion.
However, if you cannot reach infinity the adapter is actually too long. This can't really be fixed.
Thank you,
It's "ok" then as it goes beyong infinity. Focusing past a couple of meter up to the horizon will just require some focus rather than just a full ring turn..
Anyhow I'm glad that I can get sharp picture across the full frame.. Just need the right lens, would not mind a native E mount though..
[quote name='lfred' timestamp='1332782214' post='17068']
Thank you,
It's "ok" then as it goes beyong infinity. Focusing past a couple of meter up to the horizon will just require some focus rather than just a full ring turn..
Anyhow I'm glad that I can get sharp picture across the full frame.. Just need the right lens, would not mind a native E mount though..
[/quote]
Why don't you just use a magnified focus view ?
I do but still it's more convenient just to be able to use the infinity "position" to do brainless focus