[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/540-canon70300f4556doisff"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/540-canon70300f4556doisff[/url]
Could be a little better in relation to its price tag.
a little mistake in the price of its in-house competitor <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='  ' />
You put an extra 0 on the price of the non-DO lens <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ' /> I don't think I'd pay $4500 for it.
Will there be also an updated test on crop sensor?
I did get a DO for myself, pre-used so that the price was somewhat sane. The reason for choosing it over the non-DO version? So it would fit in my small camera bags <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ' /> I have the 100-400L for when I don't care about size. The only other 300mm region lens I had at the time was the Tamron 18-270 but that felt worse on the long end (both on crop sensor of course).
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1281987626' post='1821']
You put an extra 0 on the price of the non-DO lens <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='  ' /> I don't think I'd pay $4500 for it.
Will there be also an updated test on crop sensor?
I did get a DO for myself, pre-used so that the price was somewhat sane. The reason for choosing it over the non-DO version? So it would fit in my small camera bags <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ' /> I have the 100-400L for when I don't care about size. The only other 300mm region lens I had at the time was the Tamron 18-270 but that felt worse on the long end (both on crop sensor of course).
[/quote]
Thanks ... a 70-300 for 4500EUR may be a little over the top ... :-)
There'll be no update on APS-C this time. The lens is not all that interesting for the mainstream I think.
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1281990028' post='1825']
Thanks ... a 70-300 for 4500EUR may be a little over the top ... :-)[/quote]
Then again, if they did a 70-300 f/2.8 for 4500EUR, I'd possibly be 1st in line <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ' />
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
I wonder if Canon has given up on the DO design; also curious how long they spent working on the 400 and 70-300 designs prior to release. Hum. Oh well would be nice to see something new on the optical front.
Silly price tag and ugly bokeh. Yikes.
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1282048042' post='1838']
I wonder if Canon has given up on the DO design; also curious how long they spent working on the 400 and 70-300 designs prior to release. Hum. Oh well would be nice to see something new on the optical front.
[/quote]
I think they have. These multiple fresnel type lenses are great for making a lens a lot lighter and shorter, are fine when used with film, but on digital they require an expert hand at postprocessing - digital is just too sharp to obliterate the rendering side effects of these lenses.
The 70-300 DO was always praised over here as a stealth lens: it doesn't really look as long as it is, and it is black too <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ' />.
Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1282050888' post='1839']
Silly price tag and ugly bokeh. Yikes.
[/quote]
<img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ' /> - well, it is a rather complicated and difficult technology to get it right...
Kind regards, WIm
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1282048042' post='1838']
I wonder if Canon has given up on the DO design; also curious how long they spent working on the 400 and 70-300 designs prior to release. Hum. Oh well would be nice to see something new on the optical front.
[/quote]
Canon has filed a number of new patent applications for new DO lens designs. So, who knows, we may see a few more in the next few years?
|
