09-20-2014, 03:05 PM
I don't understand why pretty much everyone has to rail against the ZA lenses as not being "Zeiss" enough.
And BC, it's not like there's a dearth of 35/2 lenses out there, innit? I'm sure the forumers would've found a bone to pick with the native lens if it had been released, but in the absence of one, there's a boatload of adaptables to choose from (some even with AF, like a Minolta 35/2 - though I'm pretty sure it's hard to find now - and some even better, like the new Canon 35/2).
And BC, it's not like there's a dearth of 35/2 lenses out there, innit? I'm sure the forumers would've found a bone to pick with the native lens if it had been released, but in the absence of one, there's a boatload of adaptables to choose from (some even with AF, like a Minolta 35/2 - though I'm pretty sure it's hard to find now - and some even better, like the new Canon 35/2).