[Guest]

I was going to say sigma 60f2.8 but the comment on the 35-100 suggest after wide open the resolution should be decreasing; the sigma is availble for NEX and it is one of the sharpest lenses in existent but the profile of the curve doesn't fit; unless it sharpens up a bit after wide open.

[Rover]

Sigma 180mm macro?

[Guest]

Well he just posted  the preview of the fuji 27 and tamron 90; i'm 99% sure it is not the 27mm....

Sigma 180mm macro?

[Brightcolours]

Well he just posted  the preview of the fuji 27 and tamron 90; i'm 99% sure it is not the 27mm....

http://www.lenstip.com/361.4-Lens_review...ution.html could be, yes...

[Guest]

Perhaps you meant this link; btw they have an interesting comment how they had to change the test:

http://www.lenstip.com/385.4-Lens_review...ution.html

[Klaus]

We don't use dcraw for the tests. 

[frank]

The lenstip shows that the 27mm has bad border resolutions. So I  am sure it is the Tamron 90mm.

[Guest]

Yes I quite agree it is unlikely the 27mm; for some reason last night I was confused by bright's response. Still I find it quite interesting just how many 'good' 90mm lens exist. It begins to beg the question of why we need more (though I see this one adds vc as the key new feature).

-

I am somewhat concern about fuji QC (I guess this comment is related to the fuji thread I just read) but overall they seem to have a nice system if you like their cameras (form factor) which I do.

The lenstip shows that the 27mm has bad border resolutions. So I  am sure it is the Tamron 90mm.

[Rover]

The lenstip shows that the 27mm has bad border resolutions. So I  am sure it is the Tamron 90mm.

This was one of the first suggestions and Klaus said "nope".  :wacko:

[Klaus]

Actually, the lens has a some field curvature so the chart is misleading to some degree. ;-)