Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sigma 35mm f1.4: Sharp. Smooth foreground bokeh. Bad background bokeh.
#17
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1353935046' post='21076']

For the most part I think it looks decent; better than canon 35f2.

[/quote]

It certainly is quite a bit worse than the canon 35mm f2. the 35mm f2's problem is a 5 sided highlights (when stopped down, obviously), but it has no double line nisen bokeh background problem that this Sigma displays:

http://blog.sigmaphoto.com/wp-content/up...266529.jpg



In reality the 35mm f2 from canon has quite benign bokeh (I should know... I use it with shallow DOF a lot). not the best, but surprisingly good. Obviously you singled out the Canon 35mm f2 from the list I gave because that is the lens I own <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />/>



Showing quite smooth transitions without a nisen bokeh character wide open:

[Image: 855AA459C05F43E39E6830B52CD3127E.jpg]

Stopped down still smooth bokeh, and showing characteristic 5 sided highlights:

[Image: DE871742F86B4705872603D0753F1BD4.jpg]

Smooth transitions from focus to background blur without double lines, 5 sided highlights obvious:

[Image: 1ECF4413380D4203B4EE916CA9884648.jpg]

And more smooth bokeh with no hint anywhere of double line nisen bokeh:

[Image: 8DE91F04E0CC47B68BD04EC759436139.jpg]



Bokeh wise its main vice is that the 5 sided aperture, when stopped down, can make nasty patterns with lots of highlights.



I do not see such a benign bokeh with the Sigma 35mm f1.4.. Not with the leaf images, not with the Sigma provided images.
  


Messages In This Thread
Sigma 35mm f1.4: Sharp. Smooth foreground bokeh. Bad background bokeh. - by Brightcolours - 11-26-2012, 01:40 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)