01-03-2012, 02:10 PM
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1325593776' post='14255']
Where's the diffraction softening zone on this system again? I assume f/5.6 is way into it?
Regardless of that, I did quickly play with some sharpening and noise reduction on the samples, and they can perk up a lot with a little more processing. Certainly well into the "good enough" category.
[/quote]
According to my calculations, it is F/5 (F/4.9 to be exact). Which means that for optimimum results the lens shouldn't be stopped down further than F/4.
Kind regards, Wim
Where's the diffraction softening zone on this system again? I assume f/5.6 is way into it?
Regardless of that, I did quickly play with some sharpening and noise reduction on the samples, and they can perk up a lot with a little more processing. Certainly well into the "good enough" category.
[/quote]
According to my calculations, it is F/5 (F/4.9 to be exact). Which means that for optimimum results the lens shouldn't be stopped down further than F/4.
Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....