09-30-2011, 06:46 AM
[quote name='jenbenn' timestamp='1317294789' post='11971']
I also have to revoke an earlier statement. I said that more MP are better for larger prints (at least at low ISO). Comparing the sonys 24Mp to the 7ds 18MP through ACR I am somewhat shocked. When I interpolate the 7d image to the sony's size (all idenical settings in ACR for both cameras this time)I see better micro contrast with the 7D and a tiny, tiny bit of extra resolution for the sony. the sonys MP advantage shows only in the feather details of the image ,but its so tiny that you fail to notice it, once you step back half a meter from your monitor. Thus, print quality of both cameras will be the same at low iso. Sory sony this 24MP sensor was not a good idea...
[/quote]
Sony image is also back focused. Compare the queen of hearts at the back of the studio. A77 is sharper there.
I also have to revoke an earlier statement. I said that more MP are better for larger prints (at least at low ISO). Comparing the sonys 24Mp to the 7ds 18MP through ACR I am somewhat shocked. When I interpolate the 7d image to the sony's size (all idenical settings in ACR for both cameras this time)I see better micro contrast with the 7D and a tiny, tiny bit of extra resolution for the sony. the sonys MP advantage shows only in the feather details of the image ,but its so tiny that you fail to notice it, once you step back half a meter from your monitor. Thus, print quality of both cameras will be the same at low iso. Sory sony this 24MP sensor was not a good idea...
[/quote]
Sony image is also back focused. Compare the queen of hearts at the back of the studio. A77 is sharper there.