My observations so far:
The only downside to the Canon system is the lack of IBIS. You would think that during all these years they would have had enough time to develop IBIS like Nikon. It really sucks to have IS in lenses, except for long ones (> 200mm).
To me Nikon has the better body and Canon the better lenses.
Ahaha, tough choice!
- The lack of IBIS is a major bummer
- What is the resolution of the EVF?
- 5'655 AF points seems a bit crazy and who really needs it?
- AF is very likely better than Nikon's
- The 28-70 f2 lens is a monster but given the f2 aperture and the range, it's not surprising and actually not too bad. That said I'd take three compact f2 primes over it any day (28, 35, 50)
- The 35 f1.8 is nice and compact
- The 50 f1.2 is big but it was expected given the f1.2 aperture. IQ will probably be impressive.
The only downside to the Canon system is the lack of IBIS. You would think that during all these years they would have had enough time to develop IBIS like Nikon. It really sucks to have IS in lenses, except for long ones (> 200mm).
To me Nikon has the better body and Canon the better lenses.
Ahaha, tough choice!