09-25-2018, 11:21 AM
(09-25-2018, 08:42 AM)JJ_SO Wrote: Your opinion about Foveon sensors simply lacks of experience with it. You keep up bullshitting about aliasing, false sharpness and other crap, but so far I haven't seen it in any print. But I fully agree on the ISO performance and I also think there's no need to go FF with Foveon. There are more than enough FF sensors or bigger ones, and there's only one app to develop the Sigma-RAWs (if one doens't want to waste a lot of diskspace with Adobes's DNG monster files). Sigma's Photo Pro app needs a lot of work to get close to normal RAW development speed.
One can also criticize Sigma's cameras, but their menu system is much better than Fuji's or Sony's.
It is not opinion, it is fact. No AA-filter means fake detail and false sharpness. Foveon sensors do not have AA-filters. Ergo: fake detail and false sharpness. The bullshit crap from Sigma/Foveon about how they do not need AA-filters because of whatever is just that, bullshit crap.
Calling Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem "bullshit" is rich, it is a very well established theorem. That some people get impressed by the fake sharpness due to aliasing, is fine.