07-02-2016, 10:28 PM
The 70-200 F/4L, non-IS, is actually better at MFD, and way better at (ab)using for macro than the IS version is.
The IS version generally is a little sharper than the non-IS version, and has IS, obviously, but at MFD and when used for macro the non-IS version is clearly better.
Kind regards, Wim
The IS version generally is a little sharper than the non-IS version, and has IS, obviously, but at MFD and when used for macro the non-IS version is clearly better.
Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....