Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fuji X-Pro 2 specs leaked
#1
http://photorumors.com/2016/01/04/detail...more-78203

#2
Looks good. But of course doesn't have that "surprise bonus" anymore which the X-Pro 1 once had.


-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

#3
Do you have any experience with the metabones speedbooster? I was on the edge to adapt some Nikon lenses but at the end decided to go with a normal "non-speedbooster" as it doesn't appear there's AF connectivity.

 

Is there more to look at the X-Pro2 than just more MP?

#4
Quote:Do you have any experience with the metabones speedbooster? I was on the edge to adapt some Nikon lenses but at the end decided to go with a normal "non-speedbooster" as it doesn't appear there's AF connectivity.

 

Is there more to look at the X-Pro2 than just more MP?
Much better AF than version 1.
#5
Sorry, not interested. Who needs an optical viewfinder anyway? ;-)

#6
Thankfully after having the X100 I've grown out of the Fuji lust, where it also showed me it wasn't OVF I needed most but TTL VF.

Still, the X-Pro1 prices were already low and this can only push them lower for those who still want a play with the hybrid viewfinder.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
#7
Why there is difference in the IQ on different sites?

I first looked on IR and the images had a grainy appearence. At Lenstip samples IQ is great.
#8
Quote:Why there is difference in the IQ on different sites?

I first looked on IR and the images had a grainy appearence. At Lenstip samples IQ is great.
Probably the RAW conversion used?
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)