Opticallimits

er, yes. e-mount... I think I would prefer a fuji test personally for the 12mm.

Quote:er, yes. e-mount... I think I would prefer a fuji test personally for the 12mm.

Over E-mount for sure, as those are being done on the "broken" nex-7.

I wonder if the new a6300 will have any edge issues...

I'm still waiting for the 18-135mm review.

Anything new yet?

It's just a matter of priorities.

Canon, Nikon and Sony are keeping this site up and running ...

Has the review been canceled or is it still on your list?

But reading your conclusion gives me the feeling that I should skip this lens anyway...l

Quote:And which lenses do you think are the gems ?

 

I think the gems are mostly primes:

• 14 f2.8
  
• 16 f1.4
  
• 23 f1.4
  
• 56 f1.2
  
• 90 f2
  

And maybe these 2 zooms:

• 10-24 f4
  
• 50-140 f2.8
  

Although the 35 f1.4 didn't fare that well in the tests I find my copy to be better sharpness-wise than any other primes I have (meaning 14, 23 f1.4 and 23 f2, and 56).

Don't forget the 100-400.

Hardly a "gem" - just the only lens beyond 140 mm around for Fuji  in terms of speed and sharpness I can imagine some improvements. But for sure, it's not worse than any current 150-600 on FF. Not much worse.

Quote:Hardly a "gem" - just the only lens beyond 140 mm around for Fuji  in terms of speed and sharpness I can imagine some improvements. But for sure, it's not worse than any current 150-600 on FF. Not much worse.

Uh, I thought there's a couple of 50(ish) to 200(ish) zooms in that stable and... I think Klaus had only the warm words to speak about the 100-400.