Hello
Some Zeiss primes have never been reviewed by PZ:
- Sonnar T* E 24mm F1.8 ZA (SEL24F18Z)
<p style="margin-left:40px;">I used one for a couple of week and found it to be very good, would have bought one but I sold the NEX-6 for A7r
- Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA (SEL55F18Z)
<p style="margin-left:40px;">I have one. Very sharp... really.
- Planar T* 50mm F1.4 ZA (SAL50F14Z)
<p style="margin-left:40px;">From the reviews and Flickr pictures, not as sharp as the Sigma Art but with nicer bokeh
<p style="margin-left:40px;">
Primes are probably faster to review than zooms and much less likely to be decentered.
Could you please put them in the pipeline?
Is the Planar 1.4/50 ZA optically different from the ZF & ZE versions? Both of them have been reviewed already
Quote:Some other Zeiss primes:
the Otii
and
the Loxii
You're right. I was thinking of the Sony-specific Zeiss lenses but my post was not clear about that.
I will test the 55. Not sure about the others.
Quote:the Oti
These would probably be the most boring reviews ever - the 1.4/55 is perfect, the 1.4/85 is better
Quote:Is the Planar 1.4/50 ZA optically different from the ZF & ZE versions? Both of them have been reviewed already
Quite different. The Sony lens is an autofocus lens costing around $1500.
This is the ZE/ZF manual focus lens ($725):
![[Image: planar-50-inner.jpg]](http://www.cliftoncameras.co.uk/uploads/images/zeiss/planar-50-inner.jpg)
This the Sony Zeiss:
![[Image: Sony-Planar-T-50mm-f1.4-ZA-SSM-Lens-Cons...-Chart.jpg]](https://cdn.photographylife.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Sony-Planar-T-50mm-f1.4-ZA-SSM-Lens-Construction-and-MTF-Chart.jpg)
And don't forget the FE16-35
The FE 16-35 is scheduled for next week actually.