12-21-2014, 09:40 AM
felix
12-21-2014, 10:23 AM
In the mirrorless world, 2014 seems to be the year of the fast tele-zoom with not-so-great bokeh
But how does it fare compared to something like the 70-300L or 70-300VC? These won't render highlights perfectly either..
But how does it fare compared to something like the 70-300L or 70-300VC? These won't render highlights perfectly either..
12-21-2014, 10:37 AM
Feels a bit like the Sony 70-400G.
Guest
12-21-2014, 01:52 PM
Wonder how it will compare to the fuji lens. Also doens't the olympus lens have better resolution than the sony 70-400G ? (of course it is a 3x lens instead of a 6x lens).
12-22-2014, 08:29 AM
Quote:Wonder how it will compare to the fuji lens. Also doens't the olympus lens have better resolution than the sony 70-400G ? (of course it is a 3x lens instead of a 6x lens).
Very hard to tell. The Sony G is very good. For a comparison you have to take the 1.4x into account.
Steinar1
01-17-2015, 06:41 PM
Frankly, the boukeh is not the end all be all for this kind of lens. I have used it quite a bit and find that boukeh is perfectly OK for the higher focal ranges. The lens is very sharp, the AF is wonderful (on the EM 1) and I find it to be perfectly good replacement for my Nikon 70-200 in everyday work. It is great in the studio, although I prefer the 75 for headshots.