09-22-2014, 02:48 AM
Pages: 1 2
09-22-2014, 04:41 AM
Quote:MFT for zoom lenses. Fuji for primes. ;-)
Your verdict on the Fuji 18-55/2.8-4 is extremely positive. Stating it is a reason to enter the system. Not any longer? I have an X20 and am considering moving to Fuji for the nice JPEG colours and very usable in-camera RAW processor.
What mFT body are you after?
Did you not find time to test/assess the Zeiss before the trip? If it as bad as you say, you should have noticed within a few frames.
09-22-2014, 09:59 AM
MFT or Fuji is primarily a question of size. The 55-200mm is a rather big lens for instance.
Olympus lenses - at least the mid to pro range - are also better centered.
The X-T1 is better (for photography) than all of the MFT cameras though.
I am still thrilled by Fuji - don't understand me wrong here.
On the MFT side I am leaning towards the GMs. But again, I'm mostly into outdoors.
Olympus lenses - at least the mid to pro range - are also better centered.
The X-T1 is better (for photography) than all of the MFT cameras though.
I am still thrilled by Fuji - don't understand me wrong here.
On the MFT side I am leaning towards the GMs. But again, I'm mostly into outdoors.
Guest
10-22-2014, 09:44 AM
Quote:I just checked my vacation images taken with the A6000 and the Zeiss 16-70.
I have to admit ... I am not thrilled by the quality. The borders are rather soft.
Is the review of the Zeiss 16-70 still in the works?
10-22-2014, 02:34 PM
Quote:Is the review of the Zeiss 16-70 still in the works?
http://forum.photozone.de/index.php?/top...b/?p=28256
Pages: 1 2