12-11-2012, 03:30 AM
davidmanze
12-12-2012, 07:57 PM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1355196633' post='21160']
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/revie...78073.html
Interesting.
And it also shows that the 18-135 _IS_ a sucker.
[/quote]
Hi,
I couldn't see "the sucking and blowing" effect on this link,but,RiceHigh's blog has the video posted! Would have been super-useful had it have stated from where the air was escaping,maybe the viewfinder? Well on a WR sealed lens the air has to go somewhere? Guess it's a just a sucker lens, in many senses of the term.
Dave's clichés
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/revie...78073.html
Interesting.
And it also shows that the 18-135 _IS_ a sucker.
[/quote]
Hi,
I couldn't see "the sucking and blowing" effect on this link,but,RiceHigh's blog has the video posted! Would have been super-useful had it have stated from where the air was escaping,maybe the viewfinder? Well on a WR sealed lens the air has to go somewhere? Guess it's a just a sucker lens, in many senses of the term.
Dave's clichés
12-12-2012, 10:29 PM
I was really more referring to the visible field curvature.