04-01-2012, 07:07 AM
Yakim
04-01-2012, 07:19 AM
I forgot to look at the date. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
04-01-2012, 08:01 AM
[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1333264762' post='17242']
I forgot to look at the date. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
There will be no FF Pentax DSLR -it just doesn't make any sense.
I forgot to look at the date. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
There will be no FF Pentax DSLR -it just doesn't make any sense.
Yakim
04-01-2012, 08:15 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1333267314' post='17244']
There will be no FF Pentax DSLR -it just doesn't make any sense.
[/quote]
Well, with the Q and the K-01 Pentax have proved that common sense is not very common within its management. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
There will be no FF Pentax DSLR -it just doesn't make any sense.
[/quote]
Well, with the Q and the K-01 Pentax have proved that common sense is not very common within its management. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
04-01-2012, 09:00 AM
[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1333268125' post='17247']
Well, with the Q and the K-01 Pentax have proved that common sense is not very common within its management. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
Actually I think it's viable to offer ...
a ) a nano-mirrorless (Q)
b ) a flexible mirrorless (GXR)
c ) APS-C DSLRs with a mirrorless and classic approach
The actual implementation could be debatable, of course.
I got the impression that at least the local Pentax fellows liked the K-01. Persoanlly I consider the SLT concept to be more convincing but that's me.
I'm curious when the GXR will evolve to its next evolutionary step. It is about time.
Well, with the Q and the K-01 Pentax have proved that common sense is not very common within its management. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
Actually I think it's viable to offer ...
a ) a nano-mirrorless (Q)
b ) a flexible mirrorless (GXR)
c ) APS-C DSLRs with a mirrorless and classic approach
The actual implementation could be debatable, of course.
I got the impression that at least the local Pentax fellows liked the K-01. Persoanlly I consider the SLT concept to be more convincing but that's me.
I'm curious when the GXR will evolve to its next evolutionary step. It is about time.
netrex
04-01-2012, 10:15 AM
Nothing wrong with the K-01. I'm looking forward to getting one.
netrex
04-01-2012, 10:16 AM
There is one reason I want a full frame, and it's so my tilt/shift lens will get a wider field of view <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> I don't see a reason for a full frame other than that.
04-01-2012, 11:01 AM
[quote name='Alexander ' timestamp='1333275411' post='17253']
There is one reason I want a full frame, and it's so my tilt/shift lens will get a wider field of view <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> I don't see a reason for a full frame other than that.
[/quote]
Just make sure that you can stand the AF performance of the K-01.
There is one reason I want a full frame, and it's so my tilt/shift lens will get a wider field of view <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> I don't see a reason for a full frame other than that.
[/quote]
Just make sure that you can stand the AF performance of the K-01.
netrex
04-01-2012, 11:54 AM
I will be buying it for video and focus peaking for manual focus, so that's not a problem <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
04-01-2012, 12:03 PM
[quote name='Alexander ' timestamp='1333281256' post='17256']
I will be buying it for video and focus peaking for manual focus, so that's not a problem <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
Steve Huff reviewed it. He likes the image quality but thinks the monitor is unusable in sunshine. The latter is a deal killer for him. J
I will be buying it for video and focus peaking for manual focus, so that's not a problem <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
Steve Huff reviewed it. He likes the image quality but thinks the monitor is unusable in sunshine. The latter is a deal killer for him. J