02-11-2012, 02:14 AM
02-11-2012, 08:36 AM
Not very encouraging...
frank
02-11-2012, 09:02 AM
[quote name='Rover' timestamp='1328949395' post='15795']
Not very encouraging...
[/quote]
Yes. I even think if the tested sample got damaged during transport...
Not very encouraging...
[/quote]
Yes. I even think if the tested sample got damaged during transport...
Dick England
02-11-2012, 10:02 AM
These two pictures also suggest field curvature:
http://www.samyang.pl/download/Samyang_2..._UMC_8.jpg
http://pliki.optyczne.pl/sam24/sam24_f4.0_2.JPG
http://www.samyang.pl/download/Samyang_2..._UMC_8.jpg
http://pliki.optyczne.pl/sam24/sam24_f4.0_2.JPG
netrex
02-11-2012, 12:53 PM
Not at all the quality I expected.
02-11-2012, 01:30 PM
[quote name='Frank' timestamp='1328950969' post='15798']
Yes. I even think if the tested sample got damaged during transport...
[/quote]
Very well might be, especially in the light of the odd behaviour of the aperture mechanism. I remember FredMiranda forum users reporting all sorts of mechanical malfunctions with other Samyang lenses, most notably 14/2.8 (like focusing scale being way off).
I'd retest the lens if I were Lenstip, maybe try a specimen in F mount.
Yes. I even think if the tested sample got damaged during transport...
[/quote]
Very well might be, especially in the light of the odd behaviour of the aperture mechanism. I remember FredMiranda forum users reporting all sorts of mechanical malfunctions with other Samyang lenses, most notably 14/2.8 (like focusing scale being way off).
I'd retest the lens if I were Lenstip, maybe try a specimen in F mount.
Martin_MM
02-14-2012, 03:27 PM
[quote name='Rover' timestamp='1328967043' post='15801']
Very well might be, especially in the light of the odd behaviour of the aperture mechanism. I remember FredMiranda forum users reporting all sorts of mechanical malfunctions with other Samyang lenses, most notably 14/2.8 (like focusing scale being way off).
I'd retest the lens if I were Lenstip, maybe try a specimen in F mount.
[/quote]
Well, it might be just this sample but I doubt it... Personally I hoped so much Samyang would get this particular lens right!
BTW, like you are saying: Concerning Samyang lenses, I have also read more user reports/complaints on inferior mechanical quality / mulfunctions... -> seems like the Samyang hype is over... at least for me.
Very well might be, especially in the light of the odd behaviour of the aperture mechanism. I remember FredMiranda forum users reporting all sorts of mechanical malfunctions with other Samyang lenses, most notably 14/2.8 (like focusing scale being way off).
I'd retest the lens if I were Lenstip, maybe try a specimen in F mount.
[/quote]
Well, it might be just this sample but I doubt it... Personally I hoped so much Samyang would get this particular lens right!
BTW, like you are saying: Concerning Samyang lenses, I have also read more user reports/complaints on inferior mechanical quality / mulfunctions... -> seems like the Samyang hype is over... at least for me.
02-20-2012, 10:29 AM
Almost looks like a used 24L non-II is a better choice for the price, at least in the Canon scope. The Nikon users are, unfortunately, out of luck (I checked the price of the old 28/1.4 out of curiosity and it's insane, like 50% more at KEH than the new AF-S 24/1.4! Bonkers!)
02-20-2012, 10:48 AM
Well, things have been even worse in the past, the price of the 28/1.4 has come down (!) to the actual level after the announcement of new f/1.4 lenses (24mm, 35mm). Not too long ago mint copies of the 28/1.4 sold for up to 4000 EUR.
-- Markus
-- Markus