See attachment
Next in line:
[color="#333333"][size="2"][left]Model name (tentative): smc PENTAX-DA 560mm F5.6[/left][/size][/color][color="#333333"][size="2"][left][url="http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/announce/info-image/20120208_2.jpg"]Product Image[/url][/left][left][left]
[/left][/left][left][left]Model name (tentative): smc PENTAX-DA 50mm F1.8[/left][/left][/size][/color][color="#333333"][size="2"][left][url="http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/announce/info-image/20120208_3.jpg"]Product Image[/url][/left][/size][/color]
I saw that. I'm curious about that dot in between 500 and 600mm <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
No 135mm prime... <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.
A.
Something like a 24/2 would also be nice
Göran
Some in fo here:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-...ealed.html
SMC Pentax-DA 560mm F5.6
SMC Pentax-DA 50mm F1.8
SMC Pentax-D FA 645 90mm F2.8
In addition to these three definitive announcements, the following 4 products were hinted at:
Pentax DA XS series lens (designed for the K-01)
Pentax Q telephoto zoom lens
Pentax Q ultra-compact lens
Genuine Pentax Q K-mount adapter with built-in shutter (K mount -> Q)
Well:
http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/announ...20208.html
SMC Pentax-DA 560mm 1:5.6.. DO WANT! Seriously <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Who wants a kidney?
Also, the image of the lens that goes quite far into the camera body for the K-01. Why? Isn't it better to not have the light bend so much?
[quote name='Alexander ' timestamp='1328710720' post='15697']
Well:
http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/announ...20208.html
SMC Pentax-DA 560mm 1:5.6.. DO WANT! Seriously <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Who wants a kidney?
Also, the image of the lens that goes quite far into the camera body for the K-01. Why? Isn't it better to not have the light bend so much?
[/quote]
They just want to demonstrate that sticking with the traditional longer SLR flange-mount does not preclude producing a compact length system (body+lens)...whether it makes optical sense on digital or not...they could do it if they wanted to.
[quote name='Alexander ' timestamp='1328710720' post='15697']
Well:
http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/announ...20208.html
SMC Pentax-DA 560mm 1:5.6.. DO WANT! Seriously <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Who wants a kidney?
Also, the image of the lens that goes quite far into the camera body for the K-01. Why? Isn't it better to not have the light bend so much?
[/quote]
It looks so much like a 400/4 lens with a TC permanently welded to it. If I'd been shooting Pentax, I'd much rather have that, and use TCs as needed.