It's still nothing official. Still the same platic mock ups but I think f/2 was unrealistic anyway.
I had made a dirty (loosely accurate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />) comparison based on the mocks in the past, posted again.
[ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]
Pink is 12-35 lens, then 14-42, then 14-45.
the 35-100 f/2.8 is very interesting I think.
Nice. If it's indeed f/2.8 and that small, the 12-35mm might be the very first zoom lens for my Panny <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[quote name='Sylvain' timestamp='1326320956' post='14769']
It's still nothing official. Still the same platic mock ups but I think f/2 was unrealistic anyway.
I had made a dirty (loosely accurate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />) comparison based on the mocks in the past, posted again.
[ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]
Pink is 12-35 lens, then 14-42, then 14-45.
the 35-100 f/2.8 is very interesting I think.
[/quote]
These prototypes are different. Last year they didn't show an imprinted aperture nor the filter diameter.
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1326351603' post='14783']
These prototypes are different. Last year they didn't show an imprinted aperture nor the filter diameter.
[/quote]
I'd think they're essentially the same with added switch & stickers. Nothing I'd call new.
And a better matching than mine there :
http://www.43rumors.com/real-images-of-t...t-x-zooms/