Voigtlander Nokton 50mm f/1.1 ?
Would that really be a "vintage" lens?
-- Markus
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1324804097' post='14090']
Voigtlander Nokton 50mm f/1.1 ?
[/quote]
I don't know how to adapt that to my A900.
Exif-Data is leaking something essential to make a guess ...
sensorsize ... as it seems an A900 was used, so FF. With that,
we can guess a range of focal lengths.
Exif-Data is also leaking iso-values and exposuretimes. If we
can guess the lighting in a situation shown in a picture, we get a
range of possible max-apertures.
My guess is: a 35mm f/1.4 lens.
Rainer
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1324810938' post='14095']
Would that really be a "vintage" lens?
-- Markus
[/quote]
Mine is as old as I am, and I'm a dinosaur <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[quote name='Rainer' timestamp='1324811045' post='14097']
My guess is: a 35mm f/1.4 lens.
Rainer
[/quote]
Try brighter than that
The images you posted are not very clear in the field of view area... hard to guess the focal length. But... now you say it has a bigger max. f-value than f1.4. The Minolta MC 58mm f1.2?
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1324814808' post='14100']
The images you posted are not very clear in the field of view area... hard to guess the focal length.
[/quote]
That's the same issue I have with the images <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> They all don't look like 35mm shots, but longer. Except for the last one.
-- Markus
Is it a native Minolta / A mount, or did you use an adapter?
Serkan