[url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20110913_477001.html"]http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20110913_477001.html[/url]
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1315863203' post='11525']
[url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20110913_477001.html"]http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20110913_477001.html[/url]
[/quote]
Finally a really nice lens for the Nex? Samples look very pleasant.
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1315864239' post='11526']
Finally a really nice lens for the Nex? Samples look very pleasant.
[/quote]
Well, it's a macro lens. Nobody should really be able to mess up such a thing.
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1315891410' post='11528']Well, it's a macro lens. Nobody should really be able to mess up such a thing.[/quote]
The samples look OKish on my screen, but it´s a lightweight (the modest max aperture...) and not too pricy lens, which fits well into the NEX system.
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1315863203' post='11525']
[url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20110913_477001.html"]http://dc.watch.impr...913_477001.html[/url]
[/quote]
Looks very sharp... And the bokeh is very pleasent in all samples with various background distances. That's not something you see everyday...
But why that FL? 30mm on a 1.5 cropped sensor is neither wide nor long enough...
Serkan
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1315896989' post='11533']
But why that FL? 30mm on a 1.5 cropped sensor is neither wide nor long enough...
[/quote]
Equivalent to 50mm macro on FF. I really wish Canon would release one...
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1315894170' post='11530']
The samples look OKish on my screen, but it´s a lightweight (the modest max aperture...) and not too pricy lens, which fits well into the NEX system.
[/quote]
Okayish ? What aspect are you complaining about ? I didn't really spot a significant flaw.
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1315898713' post='11535']
Equivalent to 50mm macro on FF. I really wish Canon would release one...
[/quote]
~45mm FF equivalent, actually...
Well I use my 24-85mm zoom set to 35mm with max. 1:2 ratio on FF and it is usually not wide enough... But of course it's a personal thing...
Serkan
I´m not complaining, it´s just that I didn´t get goose pimples while looking <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1315901490' post='11538']
~45mm FF equivalent, actually...
[/quote]
Ok, I had my Canon hat on and was thinking in 1.6x, but regardless 10% is not really a significant difference.