[quote name='Walter Schulz' timestamp='1310640241' post='9992']
Canon EF 200mm f/1.8L USM?
[/quote]
That one is certainly missing in the review list ...
-- Markus
[quote name='goran h' timestamp='1310640845' post='9993']
Sigma 150/2.8
[/quote]
A legend?
-- Markus
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1310642033' post='9995']
A legend?
-- Markus
[/quote]
Yes it's legendary :-) <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/mellow.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':mellow:' /> The prices of Sigma150/non OS reach the sky last month. I cannot figure out why? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' />
lets start with question.
White or Black?
The Sigma 150mm macro is certainly one of the most popular macro lenses around.
As for the lens, I'll guess EF 135mm f/2 APS-C retest.
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1310643635' post='9998']
No hit so far. :-)
[/quote]
Yeah... and no clues (except for AF) so far...<img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Since you've said "a legend", I guess it is a prime lens, and lets say... within the 85 - 200mm range, is that so?
What about the Canon 180/3.5L? It was not perfect in the ancient APS-C test, but who knows?
[quote name='edge' timestamp='1310645983' post='10002']
50mm f/1.0?
[/quote]
While that lens is a legend, it can never achieve 4.5 optical rating on photozone!