04-12-2011, 09:35 PM
Pages: 1 2
Bare
04-13-2011, 12:21 AM
Sure that Nikon can produce a better all-round lens but then it will be 2-3x more expensive and larger than this one.
janez
04-13-2011, 04:49 AM
'... any super zoom lens is full of compromises to achieve the huge focal range.'
This is unfortunately thrue. Thanks for test.
This is unfortunately thrue. Thanks for test.
frank
04-13-2011, 05:41 AM
I guess that this lens is not much better (if better) than the Tamron 28-300mm except that it has a VR.
Guest
04-13-2011, 05:59 AM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1302644150' post='7568']
Not exactly a dream lens, I'm afraid ...
[/quote]
Uh-oh... I guess you'll get some complaints from happy users. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
Not exactly a dream lens, I'm afraid ...
[/quote]
Uh-oh... I guess you'll get some complaints from happy users. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
04-13-2011, 06:00 AM
[quote name='Frank' timestamp='1302673266' post='7572']
I guess that this lens is not much better (if better) than the Tamron 28-300mm except that it has a VR.
[/quote]
I'm tempted to find out. The Tamron is available with VC, too.
-- Markus
I guess that this lens is not much better (if better) than the Tamron 28-300mm except that it has a VR.
[/quote]
I'm tempted to find out. The Tamron is available with VC, too.
-- Markus
04-13-2011, 06:02 AM
[quote name='BG_Home' timestamp='1302674358' post='7575']
Uh-oh... I guess you'll get some complaints from happy users. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
I'm sure I will. Unforuntately, that doesn't make the lens any better <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
-- Markus
Uh-oh... I guess you'll get some complaints from happy users. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
I'm sure I will. Unforuntately, that doesn't make the lens any better <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
-- Markus
04-13-2011, 07:31 AM
[quote name='BG_Home' timestamp='1302674358' post='7575']
Uh-oh... I guess you'll get some complaints from happy users. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
Well, I'm wondering how these happy users would argue that the lens is any better relative to the 24-120/4 which has a 2.5* rating.
It is viable to be happy with a lens no matter how good or bad it is. However, it still sits within a global performance context.
And I think it's perfectly Ok to point out that it is worse than a 24-120/4 which is worse than a 24-70/2.8 which is worse than a 35/1.4.
We rated the 28-300L with 2.5* and looking at the charts this fits fine. That lens has the double price tag.
Uh-oh... I guess you'll get some complaints from happy users. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
Well, I'm wondering how these happy users would argue that the lens is any better relative to the 24-120/4 which has a 2.5* rating.
It is viable to be happy with a lens no matter how good or bad it is. However, it still sits within a global performance context.
And I think it's perfectly Ok to point out that it is worse than a 24-120/4 which is worse than a 24-70/2.8 which is worse than a 35/1.4.
We rated the 28-300L with 2.5* and looking at the charts this fits fine. That lens has the double price tag.
04-13-2011, 09:18 AM
[quote name='Frank' timestamp='1302673266' post='7572']
I guess that this lens is not much better (if better) than the Tamron 28-300mm except that it has a VR.
[/quote]
VR is image stabilization, The Tamron has VC which is... image stabilization.
The Nikon has better contrast and better (more accurate) AF.
I guess that this lens is not much better (if better) than the Tamron 28-300mm except that it has a VR.
[/quote]
VR is image stabilization, The Tamron has VC which is... image stabilization.
The Nikon has better contrast and better (more accurate) AF.
frank
04-13-2011, 09:29 AM
Sorry,I forgot that the Tamron has VC...
Pages: 1 2