02-09-2011, 01:22 PM
Pages: 1 2
02-09-2011, 01:46 PM
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1297257721' post='5999']
As long as we are talking sigma what ever became of the 85f1.4. Did it actually get released and was it anything special ?
[/quote]
It is released. In fact I ordered one today.
-- Markus
As long as we are talking sigma what ever became of the 85f1.4. Did it actually get released and was it anything special ?
[/quote]
It is released. In fact I ordered one today.
-- Markus
02-09-2011, 02:09 PM
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1297257721' post='5999']
As long as we are talking sigma what ever became of the 85f1.4. Did it actually get released and was it anything special ?
[/quote]
It is a good one
http://www.lenstip.com/277.11-Lens_revie...mmary.html
As long as we are talking sigma what ever became of the 85f1.4. Did it actually get released and was it anything special ?
[/quote]
It is a good one
http://www.lenstip.com/277.11-Lens_revie...mmary.html
Yakim
02-09-2011, 09:48 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1297260544' post='6001']
It is a good one
http://www.lenstip.com/277.11-Lens_revie...mmary.html
[/quote]
IMHO wide open sharpness is just that: Good. Not more.
It is a good one
http://www.lenstip.com/277.11-Lens_revie...mmary.html
[/quote]
IMHO wide open sharpness is just that: Good. Not more.
Yakim
02-09-2011, 09:50 PM
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1297173767' post='5962']
Hmmm.. what's new?... The [url="http://www.sigmaphoto.com/news/sigma-corporation-announces-five-new-lenses-three-new-cameras-at-pma-2010"]"FLD" glass[/url], which is actually not a fluorite glass bu claimed to have the same performance (with affordable price). Makes me think of the Sigma "APO"s...
At the same adress, the FLD glass is also clamied to have very high light transmission. I'm afraid, these 4 FLD glasses will not be utilized by the max aperture of the lens...
Serkan
[/quote]
FLD was used in the 70-200 OS but it still perform worse than the Canon 70-200 IS II.
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/sigm...p8_os_c16/
Hmmm.. what's new?... The [url="http://www.sigmaphoto.com/news/sigma-corporation-announces-five-new-lenses-three-new-cameras-at-pma-2010"]"FLD" glass[/url], which is actually not a fluorite glass bu claimed to have the same performance (with affordable price). Makes me think of the Sigma "APO"s...
At the same adress, the FLD glass is also clamied to have very high light transmission. I'm afraid, these 4 FLD glasses will not be utilized by the max aperture of the lens...
Serkan
[/quote]
FLD was used in the 70-200 OS but it still perform worse than the Canon 70-200 IS II.
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/sigm...p8_os_c16/
Bare
02-10-2011, 02:32 PM
[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1297288255' post='6009']
FLD was used in the 70-200 OS but it still perform worse than the Canon 70-200 IS II.
[/quote]
But [url="http://www.lenstip.com/263.1-Lens_review-Sigma_70-200_mm_f_2.8_EX_DG_APO_OS_HSM-Introduction.html"]it performs verry well[/url] and not so much behind a [url="http://www.lenstip.com/index.php?test=obiektywu&test_ob=270"]new Canon[/url] in terms of IQ and surely beter than old [url="http://www.lenstip.com/index.html?producent=26&obiektyw=470&typ=0&moc=0"]Canon 70-200 2,8[/url].
[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1297288118' post='6008']
IMHO wide open sharpness is just that: Good. Not more.
[/quote]
And with tha 'good' shapness it's still eneough to be on par with 2,5x times more expensive Canon 85 L
FLD was used in the 70-200 OS but it still perform worse than the Canon 70-200 IS II.
[/quote]
But [url="http://www.lenstip.com/263.1-Lens_review-Sigma_70-200_mm_f_2.8_EX_DG_APO_OS_HSM-Introduction.html"]it performs verry well[/url] and not so much behind a [url="http://www.lenstip.com/index.php?test=obiektywu&test_ob=270"]new Canon[/url] in terms of IQ and surely beter than old [url="http://www.lenstip.com/index.html?producent=26&obiektyw=470&typ=0&moc=0"]Canon 70-200 2,8[/url].
[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1297288118' post='6008']
IMHO wide open sharpness is just that: Good. Not more.
[/quote]
And with tha 'good' shapness it's still eneough to be on par with 2,5x times more expensive Canon 85 L
Pages: 1 2