[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/527-sigma2470f28eos"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/527-sigma2470f28eos[/url]
Relatively decent but still no greatness in this class.
[quote name='Klaus' date='28 June 2010 - 07:30 AM' timestamp='1277706620' post='736']
[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/527-sigma2470f28eos"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/527-sigma2470f28eos[/url]
Relatively decent but still no greatness in this class.
[/quote]
Thanks for the review, Klaus.
Not much discussion on this one, though - I thought it was the lens that got such glowing reviews on the Nikon mount? It's pity, because I was thinking this would be a cheap and cheerful alternative to the Canon 24-70.
If not for the awful field curvature issue, the Canon lens will have been the best among the various 24-70. Oh, add poor QC to the problem...
I notice that my 10-22 has field curvature issues too...
[quote name='Pinhole' date='28 June 2010 - 04:22 PM' timestamp='1277734963' post='740']
Thanks for the review, Klaus.
Not much discussion on this one, though - I thought it was the lens that got such glowing reviews on the Nikon mount? It's pity, because I was thinking this would be a cheap and cheerful alternative to the Canon 24-70.
[/quote]
The Nikon version was actually worse.
[quote name='Klaus' date='28 June 2010 - 04:27 PM' timestamp='1277738875' post='742']
The Nikon version was actually worse.
[/quote]
Duh! Silly me. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
I was thinking of the other Sigma 24-70 (macro) which got 4 stars. I'd be interested to know how it performs on full frame, though.