06-11-2010, 05:10 PM
Sylvain
06-11-2010, 10:23 PM
<img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> that's my girl!
' /> that's my girl!Guest
06-12-2010, 11:26 AM
This lens makes me want to buy into m4/3. If Olympus would just come out with an EVF camera. Or maybe when the G2 reviews are out and prices drop.
06-12-2010, 06:55 PM
Interestingly both the 9-18mm as well as the Pana 7-14mm are not distortion-corrected. The charts look pretty much the same in LightZone (which does not apply auto-correction). Possibly the higher price tags help to do the real thing.
Guest
06-13-2010, 12:08 AM
[quote name='Klaus' date='12 June 2010 - 07:55 PM' timestamp='1276368931' post='453']
Interestingly both the 9-18mm as well as the Pana 7-14mm are not distortion-corrected. The charts look pretty much the same in LightZone (which does not apply auto-correction). Possibly the higher price tags help to do the real thing.
[/quote]
Is this a hint that there will be a Pana 7-14 review soon??
Interestingly both the 9-18mm as well as the Pana 7-14mm are not distortion-corrected. The charts look pretty much the same in LightZone (which does not apply auto-correction). Possibly the higher price tags help to do the real thing.
[/quote]
Is this a hint that there will be a Pana 7-14 review soon??
06-13-2010, 08:26 AM
Yep.
Sylvain
06-13-2010, 10:25 AM
[quote name='Klaus' date='12 June 2010 - 07:55 PM' timestamp='1276368931' post='453']
Interestingly both the 9-18mm as well as the Pana 7-14mm are not distortion-corrected. The charts look pretty much the same in LightZone (which does not apply auto-correction). Possibly the higher price tags help to do the real thing.
[/quote]
Klaus, dpreview indicated in both 7-14 & 9-18 reviews that distortion were corrected and their supplied distortion grids seem to prove it.
Olympus at 9mm we go from +4.7 to +1.41% ; Panasonic at 7mm we go from +3.4% to -0.14%.
Or am I reading something wrong?
Greetings,
S.
Interestingly both the 9-18mm as well as the Pana 7-14mm are not distortion-corrected. The charts look pretty much the same in LightZone (which does not apply auto-correction). Possibly the higher price tags help to do the real thing.
[/quote]
Klaus, dpreview indicated in both 7-14 & 9-18 reviews that distortion were corrected and their supplied distortion grids seem to prove it.
Olympus at 9mm we go from +4.7 to +1.41% ; Panasonic at 7mm we go from +3.4% to -0.14%.
Or am I reading something wrong?
Greetings,
S.
06-13-2010, 11:15 AM
[quote name='Sylvain' date='13 June 2010 - 12:25 PM' timestamp='1276424727' post='464']
Klaus, dpreview indicated in both 7-14 & 9-18 reviews that distortion were corrected and their supplied distortion grids seem to prove it.
Olympus at 9mm we go from +4.7 to +1.41% ; Panasonic at 7mm we go from +3.4% to -0.14%.
Or am I reading something wrong?
Greetings,
S.
[/quote]
Hmmh, I don't get 0.14% from the Pana lens here. I will give it a try with a different RAW converter. Maybe LightZone applies auto-correction by now.
Klaus, dpreview indicated in both 7-14 & 9-18 reviews that distortion were corrected and their supplied distortion grids seem to prove it.
Olympus at 9mm we go from +4.7 to +1.41% ; Panasonic at 7mm we go from +3.4% to -0.14%.
Or am I reading something wrong?
Greetings,
S.
[/quote]
Hmmh, I don't get 0.14% from the Pana lens here. I will give it a try with a different RAW converter. Maybe LightZone applies auto-correction by now.
06-13-2010, 11:16 AM
[quote name='Sylvain' date='13 June 2010 - 12:25 PM' timestamp='1276424727' post='464']
Klaus, dpreview indicated in both 7-14 & 9-18 reviews that distortion were corrected and their supplied distortion grids seem to prove it.
Olympus at 9mm we go from +4.7 to +1.41% ; Panasonic at 7mm we go from +3.4% to -0.14%.
Or am I reading something wrong?
Greetings,
S.
[/quote]
Hmmh, I don't get 0.14% from the Pana lens here. I will give it a try with a different RAW converter. Maybe LightZone applies auto-correction by now.
Klaus, dpreview indicated in both 7-14 & 9-18 reviews that distortion were corrected and their supplied distortion grids seem to prove it.
Olympus at 9mm we go from +4.7 to +1.41% ; Panasonic at 7mm we go from +3.4% to -0.14%.
Or am I reading something wrong?
Greetings,
S.
[/quote]
Hmmh, I don't get 0.14% from the Pana lens here. I will give it a try with a different RAW converter. Maybe LightZone applies auto-correction by now.
Sylvain
06-13-2010, 01:39 PM
After a quick check, other reviews go in dpreview direction. I suppose Lightzone corrects them now.
http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/zproducts...eodist.gif
[quote name='Klaus' date='13 June 2010 - 12:15 PM' timestamp='1276427750' post='466']
Hmmh, I don't get 0.14% from the Pana lens here. I will give it a try with a different RAW converter. Maybe LightZone applies auto-correction by now.
[/quote]
http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/zproducts...eodist.gif
[quote name='Klaus' date='13 June 2010 - 12:15 PM' timestamp='1276427750' post='466']
Hmmh, I don't get 0.14% from the Pana lens here. I will give it a try with a different RAW converter. Maybe LightZone applies auto-correction by now.
[/quote]