06-07-2010, 04:10 PM
06-07-2010, 05:19 PM
A bit harsh it seems but they surely have some points here.
I'm wondering why they haven't simply made the 16mm f/2.8 to show up as f/4. Nobody would have noticed this an the results would have been more sound.
I'm wondering why they haven't simply made the 16mm f/2.8 to show up as f/4. Nobody would have noticed this an the results would have been more sound.
Sylvain
06-07-2010, 05:26 PM
And that's good! Maybe this will teach Sony and the NEXt ones will be excellent ! hopefully
Harald Brauer
06-08-2010, 01:16 AM
I guess before that we'll get a new Panasonic LUMIX DMC-GF1 (4 Pete's sake, why do they always use those long names?! *haha*) that is likely to outperform both the NEX-3 and NEX-5.
But to be honest, the proportions look a bit funny on the NX-5 due to the cuts on the base. It's a bit like trying to remove as much around the lens mount as possible oO
But to be honest, the proportions look a bit funny on the NX-5 due to the cuts on the base. It's a bit like trying to remove as much around the lens mount as possible oO
Guest
06-08-2010, 05:26 AM
It's unfortunate that Sony finally manages to squeeze in good sensors into their interchangeable lens cameras, but are let down by atrocious design.