Opticallimits

http://largesense.com/products/8x10-larg...ack-ls911/

75 micron pixel size

For comparison - D850: 4.35 microns

ISO in the millions?

EDIT: Apparently not. Oh well, my $107K inheritance has not yet arrived.

Actually just 2 iso modes
Base ISO 2,100 - with IR filter - (approximate)
High ISO 6,400 - with IR filter - (approximate)

Well, reading the excerpt in the email my first thought was: ok, at least this camera sees in the dark. But ISO 6400... other cameras do. I suppose this does better, ok, but for 107k?

Anyway, can please somebody explain me what this means:

"75 micron pixel size--These are very large and sharp compared to high resolution small format cameras."

What actually does mean that a large pixel (that BTW it's rather a large photosite) is "sharp"?

I think this camera is really about superior tonality and DR.

With a less than great lens, bigger pixels will mask softness of the optics. I guess they mean that. Or that they don't do equivalence, and count themselves rich in the diffraction and noise game.
Or they mean this as "sharp":
http://largesense.com/files/cache/254a7e...b_f397.jpg

Did you say... EQUIVALENCE?

(new emoticons aren't good as the old ones)

(04-18-2018, 01:40 PM)Brightcolours Wrote: [ -> ]With a less than great lens, bigger pixels will mask softness of the optics. I guess they mean that. Or that they don't do equivalence, and count themselves rich in the diffraction and noise game.
Or they mean this as "sharp":
http://largesense.com/files/cache/254a7e...b_f397.jpg

AM STONED 

Toooo large.

12 MP monochrome.

Meaning: For color pictures you need to filter the light and stack the RGB shots?

And: At 8×10 inch printing I'm rather sure to see the 0.075 mm tiles. So after all, the same limits as every Canon G11 or Nikon P7800 have in terms of large printing, horrible diagonals, power-lines as stairs... wow.

I take a dozen and get a 144 MP system, swallow that, smombies! Will take ages to set up on a normal Leopard tank, but the tank has it's own IBIS.