Nice, for when we used to have 2mp cameras (... the year 2000)? How about making higher res. images available?
(07-22-2018, 10:52 AM)toni-a Wrote: [ -> ]https://photozone.smugmug.com/Sony-FE-70...-vmhSzK6/A
Flare performance doesn't seem good
Is there any tele lens with a good backlit performance? I haven't met any ...
(07-22-2018, 10:41 AM)Brightcolours Wrote: [ -> ]Nice, for when we used to have 2mp cameras (... the year 2000)? How about making higher res. images available?
Sorry, I'm always forgetting to lift the photo protection. [Done]
The Nikkor AF-S 70-200m f2.8 E FL VR has made an improvement in that area compared to the lens it replaces, and that replaced lens already did better than the Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8 IS USM II, concerning veiling. The IS USM III is supposed to have improved there (it has updated to better newer coatings).
(07-22-2018, 11:17 AM)Brightcolours Wrote: [ -> ]The Nikkor AF-S 70-200m f2.8 E FL VR has made an improvement in that area compared to the lens it replaces, and that replaced lens already did better than the Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8 IS USM II, concerning veiling. The IS USM III is supposed to have improved there (it has updated to better newer coatings).
I have doubts here ...
The issue with tele lenses and flare is not just about coating. I suspect this relates to the number of large optical elements that magnify the flare/glare.