12-17-2019, 11:21 PM
davidmanze
12-18-2019, 08:23 AM
(12-17-2019, 11:21 PM)JJ_SO Wrote: [ -> ]Who is one?
Who isn't?
12-18-2019, 08:29 AM
davidmanze
12-18-2019, 10:07 AM
12-19-2019, 07:07 AM
Chris and Jordan confirmed the average or less-than-average optical quality of the Fujinon. For still photos.
But for filming it's a different story, according to Jordan: Chris and he were excited about the capabilities of the OIS, Jordan mentioned at 16:9 the corners are not that bad like on 3:2, the minimized focus breathing and good manual focus (although that part looked not very smooth). What also did look good, was the shape of highlights. Unfortunately onion rings...
But for filming it's a different story, according to Jordan: Chris and he were excited about the capabilities of the OIS, Jordan mentioned at 16:9 the corners are not that bad like on 3:2, the minimized focus breathing and good manual focus (although that part looked not very smooth). What also did look good, was the shape of highlights. Unfortunately onion rings...
12-26-2019, 02:55 PM
I wanted to chime in here and say that I am really looking forward to the review of the new 16-80 f4 lens. I was close to getting it when it came out, but held off due to mixed reports. I would love to read a technical review that I can fully trust.
01-23-2020, 04:45 PM
EPZ test is up:
https://www.ephotozine.com/article/fujifilm-fujinon-xf-16-80mm-f-4-r-ois-wr-review-34410/performance
Well... if even they find the edges to be subpar at most focal lengths (and they do), I imagine it would be a bloodbath in Klaus' lab.
https://www.ephotozine.com/article/fujifilm-fujinon-xf-16-80mm-f-4-r-ois-wr-review-34410/performance
Well... if even they find the edges to be subpar at most focal lengths (and they do), I imagine it would be a bloodbath in Klaus' lab.
01-23-2020, 08:22 PM
(01-23-2020, 04:45 PM)Rover Wrote: [ -> ]EPZ test is up:
https://www.ephotozine.com/article/fujifilm-fujinon-xf-16-80mm-f-4-r-ois-wr-review-34410/performance
Well... if even they find the edges to be subpar at most focal lengths (and they do), I imagine it would be a bloodbath in Klaus' lab.
Love the meaningless EPZ rating: 4.5/5 for optical quality, ahaha, what a joke! Welcome to the feel good american way of doing ratings.
That's why I love OpticalLimits so much: you guys are just and 2.5 out of 5 doesn't mean it's bad but average. Good for you :-)
Anyway, I'm glad I purchased the Oly 12-100 f4 instead. It's a marvelous lens (despite the size), very sharp even in the corners at all focal lengths. Perfect travel companion.
01-23-2020, 08:54 PM
Markus has it (and the 16/1.4, 15-45, 8-16) on his desk ...
It's time for a new bloodbath anyway ;-)
It's time for a new bloodbath anyway ;-)
01-24-2020, 05:09 AM
(01-23-2020, 08:54 PM)Klaus Wrote: [ -> ]Markus has it (and the 16/1.4, 15-45, 8-16) on his desk ...
It's time for a new bloodbath anyway ;-)
I am excited to see the review for the 16-80 and 15-45. I am curious to see what you find.