At last!
Finally!
What did it take them so long?
The images at DPR look great.
Most of EM1 mk2 in a smaller body. Nice.
I'm quite baffled by the negative feedbacks in the DPR comment sections.
Other than the pricing I can't detect something that is obviously flawed.
It's not a FF camera but so what.
Woah, it delivers authentic shooting.
(10-18-2019, 04:14 PM)Klaus Wrote: [ -> ]"Other than the pricing I can't detect something that is obviously flawed".
Klaus, I believe this is the main trigger. For $100 more one can purchase Fuji X-T3.
(10-17-2019, 06:27 PM)borisbg Wrote: [ -> ]At last!
Finally!
What did it take them so long?
The images at DPR look great.
The higher ISO images look crap (ISO 3200 for instance). But of course, FF equivalent ISO settings on FF never look great either (equivalent if for whatever reason you need to shoot f8, in this case).
The rest of the images look exactly like they would with any other camera...
Hello there,
I've been following this E-M5 III for while and i cannot decide if it's better to go with mark II or mark III.
Now that we have the specs, what do you guys think ?
MK iii
I think there will be discounts for holidays.