05-29-2020, 06:06 AM
Pages: 1 2
05-29-2020, 09:55 AM
28-300/3.5-6.3, that's more like it. Come on, f/4 at 200mm? A snowball's chance in hell at that size.
05-29-2020, 10:40 AM
24-70mm f/2.8
05-30-2020, 09:03 AM
(05-29-2020, 10:40 AM)Klaus Wrote: [ -> ]24-70mm f/2.8
very unlikely, they already have a 28-70f2.8
most likely it's a superzoom or maybe a 28-135f4 lens
05-30-2020, 04:46 PM
Remember the Tamron 24-135/3.5-5.6 of yore?
https://opticallimits.com/canon-eos/295-...rt--review
Well, maybe something along these lines.
https://opticallimits.com/canon-eos/295-...rt--review
Well, maybe something along these lines.
05-31-2020, 06:41 AM
(05-30-2020, 04:46 PM)Rover Wrote: [ -> ]Remember the Tamron 24-135/3.5-5.6 of yore?
https://opticallimits.com/canon-eos/295-...rt--review
A review without sample pictures ???
Klaus you must get this lens again, get 350D and take sample pictures for us.
Also test charts were shot in Germany so you mustgo back to Germany to take them for the sake of precision
05-31-2020, 06:45 AM
Yeah and we all need to become 15 years younger too. 

06-06-2020, 11:46 PM
28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD
Interesting aperture at 28mm ... but otherwise ... yawn. 28mm is yesteryear.
Interesting aperture at 28mm ... but otherwise ... yawn. 28mm is yesteryear.
06-07-2020, 04:48 AM
Not bad actually as a range, and probably will do well in reviews, however reviews are made on brand new lenses in mint condition
the old Tamron 28-200 was very prone to failures, I have one that I got for free with a film body, it failed very rapidly. The newer 28-300 seems also prone to failures, two of my friends bought one, both lenses rapidly failed.
Also keep in mind Tamron "Lies" about focal length, I expect it to be a 30-180mm (but most makers do the same)
the old Tamron 28-200 was very prone to failures, I have one that I got for free with a film body, it failed very rapidly. The newer 28-300 seems also prone to failures, two of my friends bought one, both lenses rapidly failed.
Also keep in mind Tamron "Lies" about focal length, I expect it to be a 30-180mm (but most makers do the same)
06-11-2020, 06:21 AM
So yeah... It's here. They say it's f/3.5 at 50mm, f/4.5 at 100mm and f/5.6 out from 150mm onwards. Pretty nice if true though they seem to miss the f/4 and f/5. 
I did appreciate the fact that their 70-300 VC was f/4.5 up to about 153mm, thus usefully far into the range, for example.

I did appreciate the fact that their 70-300 VC was f/4.5 up to about 153mm, thus usefully far into the range, for example.
Pages: 1 2